The Radish Forum Index
The University of Birmingham discussion board: underground, uncensored, online :: engage@theradish.org.uk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log inLog in            Calendar

Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   



COMPULSORY UPGRADE Request an upgrade NOW! 32+ Pre-installed Modifications! 3 Server Locations to choose from: USA, UK and JAPAN.

11th December 2012 - CreatephpBB: All servers are upgraded to run using SSD drive. Click Here to report problems!

Guild Council: totally monotonous, increasingly irrelevant!
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Radish Forum Index -> Guild Democracy
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
higuy
Black Bloc
Joined: 02 Mar 2006
Posts: 301
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:44 pm    Post subject: Guild Council: totally monotonous, increasingly irrelevant! Reply with quote

Just some thoughts after yesterdays GC. Is it just me or was yesterday practically a waste of time? We dished out censures on the officers who had not submitted reports, GC then had hardly any questions for those officers who did submit reports - I doubt many people read them to be honest. So much for holding the exec to account.

Full credit to the boys from BUCF, they're almost as annoying as Josh. My favourite bit was when one of them got up to make a speech against, realised he had nothing to say, just went over what the speech for had said and sat down. The grilling they gave out with questions on motions was also impressive.

And that is one of my gripes with GC last night. People were asking questions at the expense of making speeches. The Shell motion was a good example. If someone was against it they should have just got up and initiated the debate, rather then ask slanted questions as they did.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hannoir
Black Bloc
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 339
:
Location: in a hole

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 2:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My fave bit (apart from me chairing, of course!) was when BUCF man kept asking me about inflation rates. I felt as though he assumed I was a know nothing about economics lefty arts student.

But yes. I've echoed my sentiments on facebook I think. And I am too cold to write them over again.
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hannoir/ - check out my photos....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
naivehottie
Black Bloc
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 385
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I quite enjoyed it to be fair and I got a motion passed. Conservative Future were entertaining but no match on the piss take scales to Josh/Rich Morris/Lee Whittaker. Them speaking on censuring Gary was pretty funny though, although since it was only half an hour late and the first time he didn't deserve one in my opinion. Two exec officers are looking like being in trouble sooner or later over it though.

Noone was up for going to Chaos afterwards Wink Although it's a good thing really and I'm glad the motion passed as I don't want the Guild supporting a night like that. If people voluntarily took off clothes (provided it didn't breach health and safety or hygiene rules) then that's up to them and I think they should be allowed (it's not unknown for girls to take their top off at fab, although admittedly they keep their bra on) but active encouragement of it is wrong, as is taking pictures and not making it clear that that will happen when advertising and I don't like pushy promotion either.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 17
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

GC went really slow. The motions were boring, although I’m glad the Chaos motion was starred because GC needed to hear about it. In fact would you agree that it is important to at least hear the proposor’s thoughts behind each motion even when they are not starred?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
multitasking
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 12
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I guess the main problem were the reports. Then probably very few people actually read the reports. The unecessary starred motions made me very angry. Glad chaos motion went through. Feel sorry for the indi chairs for not getting life membership but there will be a revised motion on that anyway.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JulienP
Black Bloc
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 463
:
Location: Selly Park, Birmingham

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

hannoir wrote:
My fave bit (apart from me chairing, of course!) was when BUCF man kept asking me about inflation rates. I felt as though he assumed I was a know nothing about economics lefty arts student.

But yes. I've echoed my sentiments on facebook I think. And I am too cold to write them over again.


Why were you chairing? Over the indie-chair life membership motion I assume?

Can someone post up clearly which motions passed and which ones fell, cos I am getting rather confused from all the ramblings.
_________________
Big Brother is watching YOU!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobby
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 17
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Why is starring something making you angry? Don't you think just passing something through is non-democratic? Tom Marley told GC it was a waste of time to star things if there was noone to stand against the motion and i think he has a point but i think even if you have a question for the person proposing the motion then it should be starred. I think that asking a question is part of the debate not merely standing against the motion (although this obviously plays a vital role).
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
multitasking
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 05 Dec 2006
Posts: 12
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobby wrote:
Why is starring something making you angry? Don't you think just passing something through is non-democratic? Tom Marley told GC it was a waste of time to star things if there was noone to stand against the motion and i think he has a point but i think even if you have a question for the person proposing the motion then it should be starred. I think that asking a question is part of the debate not merely standing against the motion (although this obviously plays a vital role).


ok. I am referring to people who have no interests in motions but nevertheless star them. There was 2 motions that nobody objected to and nobody wanted to ask any questions. But somebody just starred the motion and then remained silent when it came to speeches against the motion or questions...

I embrace democracy but I do not feel that starring motions without having anything to say is a very democratic act.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
hannoir
Black Bloc
Joined: 22 Jan 2006
Posts: 339
:
Location: in a hole

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 7:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes Julien, I got to chair for that motion Smile

From the top of my head, indy chair and societies motions fell, and everything else passed? The niteline motion was withdrawn.
_________________
http://www.flickr.com/photos/hannoir/ - check out my photos....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message AIM Address MSN Messenger
naivehottie
Black Bloc
Joined: 01 Apr 2006
Posts: 385
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Guild is non-smoking as of today as well
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 17
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Glad the smoking got banned, and more glad the "independant" chairs didn't get what they wanted! Checky gits!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobby
Indymedia Hound
Joined: 26 Jan 2007
Posts: 17
:

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Or even cheaky gits! Take your pick!!! Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SimonM
Black Bloc
Joined: 16 Feb 2006
Posts: 327
:
Location: Selly Oak

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I leave the room for twenty minutes and you guys fail to pass the indy chair life membership motion. Useless!

Almost nothing of any note happened at this GC, unfortunately. Smoking ban ratified at the start. Hayden's absurd motion on societies rightly fell. The Chaos motion passed, and it's great that we had a proper debate and formed a consensus by the end of it. We renamed the VPFS to VPDR (Democracy and Resources, which I keep forgetting and everyone else will too), and rather sneakily also renamed the VPAQA to the VP Education and Access; both come into effect for next year's officers. Some other motions passed or didn't - I was pretty indifferent about the rest.

We derecognised a load of societies who couldn't be bothered to reply/turn up to dozens of emails, notes in pigeonholes, a couple of soc rec/derec meetings and several GCs, and gave a second chance to the two who finally turned up yesterday to make their case.

We censured three officers, at least two of whom definitely deserved it, and chose not to censure the ones who didn't, thereby setting a nice precedent and hopefully giving officers an incentive to submit reports on time in future. Creating this automatic process was a good motion, and I'm glad we did it.

That anonymous marking motion nonsense was withdrawn for some reason. We were ready to ask lots of questions about the Guild Governance stuff in the resources committee report, but discussion of it was mysteriously postponed.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website MSN Messenger
JulienP
Black Bloc
Joined: 04 Mar 2006
Posts: 463
:
Location: Selly Park, Birmingham

Items
PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 10:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobby wrote:
Glad the smoking got banned, and more glad the "independant" chairs didn't get what they wanted! Checky gits!


Erm, they didn't submit that motion, heck they didn't even chair that motion, cos of a conflict of interest, and with all due respect, they deserve recognition. This isn't a case of scratching one's own back and lining one's own pockets. It's a case of recognising the good work the indie chairs do, extensive over-time they do, and the massive responsibility they have as guardians of our democratic flame.

No1's answered the question I want answered, did the Shell Motion pass? Heard that somebody starred it, didn't speak against it, and then asked questions instead, can someone clarify please?
_________________
Big Brother is watching YOU!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
scruffy
Black Bloc
Joined: 29 Jan 2006
Posts: 120
:
Location: birmingham

Items
PostPosted: Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

hello

yes Julien, the Shell motion did pass. It was a good motion and I'm glad it did.

And the anonymous marking motion did pass. It was put immediately because it was a fairly simple premise.
_________________
"the hardest thing to do in politics is nothing"
President of the Guild of Students
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
     
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    The Radish Forum Index -> Guild Democracy All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
The Radish topic RSS feed 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group

Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron

FREE FORUM HOSTING by AtFreeForum. Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
FASHION ACCESSORIES - BLING BLING - LADIES WATCHES - KOREAN CHILDREN CLOTHING - ONLINE BARGAIN STORE - FASHION JEWELLERIES