
The University of Birmingham discussion board: underground, uncensored, online :: engage@theradish.org.uk
|
COMPULSORY UPGRADE Request an upgrade NOW! 32+ Pre-installed Modifications! 3 Server Locations to choose from: USA, UK and JAPAN.
11th December 2012 - CreatephpBB: All servers are upgraded to run using SSD drive. Click Here to report problems!
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 01, 2006 10:27 pm Post subject: How to start a new society? |
|
|
I wish to start a new student group to campaign against the TV licence.
Not only does the university and the guild do precious little to curb the worst excesses of TVLA propaganda, they seem to be active collaborators. There are posters everywhere saying, "Pay up or else"; where are the ones confirming that you don't need a licence to play console games or watch pre-recorded DVDs?
My main objective is to have a stand in Freshers' Fair in September, getting students to pledge not to buy a TV licence for a year. If enough people sign the pledge, I'll put their names into a raffle, and one of them will win a battery-operated TV! (The point is that battery-operated TVs are covered by your parents' home licence; even if they don't have one, who's to say you're not going to connect the TV to a games console?)
What do I need to do to get this off the ground? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| hannoir Black Bloc
 | | Joined: 22 Jan 2006 | | Posts: 339 | | : | | Location: in a hole | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
Go to the basement. i think you need 20 signatures and proposals of what you will do etc. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/hannoir/ - check out my photos.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| doc_ido Sandal-wearing bean eater
 | | Joined: 21 Jan 2006 | | Posts: 192 | | : | | Location: The road less travelled | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
The TVLA pay the Guild to have those posters up, so it's unlikely they'll provide any material that might lose them money.
Hannoir's right - the Basement have all the forms and info you need. The Guild will scrutinise you very closely, though, as they have an active campaign to get students to pay for their TV license. _________________ We cannot choose what we are. Yet what are we, but the sum of our choices? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 12:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| doc_ido wrote: | | The Guild will scrutinise you very closely, though, as they have an active campaign to get students to pay for their TV license. |
What? Even if they don't need one? (For instance, if they don't even have a TV!)
The Guild have got a poster up, saying:
| Quote: | Look at all the wonderful things the NUS has done for students over the past 40 years:
Exempted them from the Council Tax.
Got an 80% rebate on the Poll Tax.
Prevented top-up fees the first time the Tories proposed them. |
Sod all about the TV Licence.
Clearly this is one case where they can't take credit for their predecessor's efforts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
thing is you cant just set up a society to campaign on a single issue, why dont you just start a campaign.
To set up a society firstly before you go to the basement counter you should email Stu Mathers, VPSA, to get approval. The you can get the recognition pack from the Guild, it doesnt take long to it fill in and collect the signatures. However you cant just start: you need to be recognised by the Guild. The Guild will give you money, you have to show what the campaign will be about, what your longterm aims are. The whole thing is a bit silly, you dont need a whole society to campaign on one issue. Quite frankly you wont get recognised.
If you really want to campaign on this issue then speak to the campaigns officer, Pete Mason. You dont need to set up your own society though if you make a good case he may take your campaign on and you could run it in the Guild.
However if i am to be honest i dont think they will. Fact is students are watching TVs without a licence and even though the amount we pay is ridiculous the fines we get after a court appearance are worse. The Guild does not want to see any students in court with a fine of £2000 because of a £100 TV licence. They would not run the campaign for this reason, more students would take the risk - some would just be confused. The campaign is therefore not really gonna take off. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 5:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'll take your procedural advice on board. But I would like to correct a few misconceptions.
First of all, you don't need a TV licence unless you are watching or recording live programmes. Games consoles, commercial DVDs, and stuff that your mum taped for you and bunged in the post, don't require a licence.
The TVLA's gumph is quite deliberate in not making this clear. A few days ago, I was talking to someone who spent four years at university, and bought four years' worth of TV licences for a TV set he never used to watch broadcast TV. Guess how annoyed he was when he looked up info about TV licensing on the net, and learned that he has spent all that money for nothing.
There's also the rule about homes of multiple occupancy, which basically says that any licensable use of a TV behind a lockable door requires a separate licence. This includes students in halls of residence, and students in private accommodation who put TVs in their bedrooms, which are not covered by the communal licence.
In other words, even if you pay up for your student flat, the bastards will still come sniffing round, to see if they can extract yet more money from you.
Now the good news:
The TV inspectors cannot compel you to answer questions.
They cannot enter your home unless you let them or they get a search warrant. They need as much evidence to get a search warrant as they would to convict you, so the threat of search warrants is just a bluff.
They rely on people incriminating themselves when questioned. They'll try and catch you out by pretending to be conducting a survey about what programmes you watch.
Conclusion: don't talk to strangers on the doorstep, and never, ever invite them into your home. Chances are they're confidence tricksters (and I quite deliberately include TVL officers in this category.)
By the way, the maximum fine is £1000, not £2000, and the TV licence is £131.50 as of April. Noone pays the maximum fine: the typical penalty, if you plead poverty, is about a £140 fine plus costs; and since TVL target people in deprived areas, they expect everyone to plead poverty. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| doc_ido Sandal-wearing bean eater
 | | Joined: 21 Jan 2006 | | Posts: 192 | | : | | Location: The road less travelled | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 10:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Hmm, yeah. This might sound a bit radical, but you could always buy a TV license if you're planning on watching TV. _________________ We cannot choose what we are. Yet what are we, but the sum of our choices? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| doc_ido wrote: | | Hmm, yeah. This might sound a bit radical, but you could always buy a TV license if you're planning on watching TV. |
And if you're not planning to watch TV, you could spend the money on a T-shirt saying, "Welcome", lie down on your doorstep, and let the TVL inspectors walk all over you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| NunOnTheRun Meeting Facilitator
 | | Joined: 09 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 28 | | : | | Location: Convent | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 2:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So if i buy a TV, and remove the tuner module.. (not difficult)
And feed it from the SCART output of my digibox / cable box / sattelite box.. Then i'm only using the tv as a viewer for non analogue broadcast signals. So does that mean i don't need a License? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Thu Mar 09, 2006 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| NunOnTheRun wrote: | | So if i buy a TV, and remove the tuner module.. (not difficult) |
The easier way to do it is simply to detune all the channels and not have the TV anywhere near an aerial.Someone I knew from over a decade ago has got it in writing from TVLA that this is sufficient. See http://www.jifvik.org/tv/
| NunOnTheRun wrote: | | And feed it from the SCART output of my digibox / cable box / sattelite box.. Then i'm only using the tv as a viewer for non analogue broadcast signals. So does that mean i don't need a License? |
That would have worked in the past. There was a test case back in the early days of Sky TV, in which someone set up his telly so it could only receive Sky, and because he couldn't receive any BBC channels, the magistrate interpreted the old 1949 law to say that he didn't need a licence.
Since then, BBC 1/2/3/4 have been bundled with every TV subscription package available in the UK. If you tried the same thing nowadays, it would be just like saying you only ever watch ITV1 on analogue terrestrial, which unfortunately isn't good enough.
In 2003, the Govewrnment introduced a new law which says that, even if you point your satellite dish so that it can only receive foreign broadcasts, you still have to pay the BBC tithe. Effectively, you're handing over money to the BBC for no broadcasts whatsoever!
Noises have been made about broadcasting BBC programmes over the internet, with a view to requiring people to buy a TV licence even if they only have internet access, and no TV at all.
You might have an opinion about paying through the nose for the BBC's entire output, if you only ever use the internet for Hotmail, TheRadish and WebCT. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| Oktober Black Bloc
 | | Joined: 20 Feb 2006 | | Posts: 290 | | : | | Location: Maple Skank | Items |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
I belive the phrase used is 'broadcast signal' which includes analogue and digital terestrial, any sattelite or cable. Now if you hooked up your TV to the video out of your PC and watched shoutcast internet TV or something similar on it, that should (of course what some ancient judge with the technical knowledge of a gibon would rule who knows) not count as internet TV is not broadcast but streamed individually to each viewer, it is a narrowcast.
PC TV cards have the same rule, they only need a licence if you use them for watching broadcasts or recording broadcasts, if you use them for converting analogue video from camcorder or whatever for editing, then you don't need a licence.
Watching videos that someone else recorded is fine from a TV licence point of view, but it may be a breach of copyright, as suposedly you can only video stuff from the TV for 'time shifted viewing' but this is a matter for the copyright owners, not the TV licencers. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| hannoir Black Bloc
 | | Joined: 22 Jan 2006 | | Posts: 339 | | : | | Location: in a hole | Items |
|
Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2006 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Much better to pay the license and have no ads on a few channels than have to put up with anoying ad breaks. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/hannoir/ - check out my photos.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hannoir wrote: | | Much better to pay the license and have no ads on a few channels than have to put up with anoying ad breaks. |
You're obviously not Irish. Over there they have a TV licence fee, much stricter rules about who has to pay it (*), and adverts on RTE.
(*) If you have an aerial on your roof, and no TV set in your house, you still have to pay in Ireland.
Besides, do you realise that the TV licence is set to go up by 2.5% above inflation every year for the next decade? Why? So the BBC can fund the costs of switching over to terrestrial digital TV (Freeview), and turning off the analogue signal.
Who gets to keep the money that will be made by selling off all these new digital TV frequencies that will then become available? H. M. Treasury.
Who doesn't get to see a penny of this money, having forked out through the nose for it for a decade? You. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| hannoir Black Bloc
 | | Joined: 22 Jan 2006 | | Posts: 339 | | : | | Location: in a hole | Items |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 8:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
Whine whine.
Honestly, here in NZ they have 4 TV channels, all with ads everywhere, no freeview or chance of slightly sophisticated anything, and well, its basically crap. And they dont pay a licence fee.
You dont know how lucky you are. _________________ http://www.flickr.com/photos/hannoir/ - check out my photos.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| evilclive Indymedia Hound
| | Joined: 01 Mar 2006 | | Posts: 14 | | : | | Items |
|
Posted: Wed Mar 15, 2006 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| hannoir wrote: | | Honestly, here in NZ they have 4 TV channels, all with ads everywhere, no freeview or chance of slightly sophisticated anything, and well, its basically crap. And they dont pay a licence fee. |
What it really boils down to is, why should your TV viewing preferences be subsidised by demanding money with menaces from every non-TV watching household in the country?
Have a look at the BBC's 2005 report to the DCMS (Department of Culture, Media and Sport), "Delivering Public Value".
http://www.tvlicensing.biz/pdf/bbc_licence_information.pdf
At the bottom of page 95 is a table showing that if the BBC were available as a subscription package, rather than as a tax on TV ownership, 58% of households would opt out of receiving the BBC altogether, and only 22% would pay £11 a month (the level of the TV licence as of next month) for BBC 1/2 and the Freeview channels.
See also
http://media.guardian.co.uk/bbc/story/0,,1306275,00.html
or, if you don't want to subscribe to the Guardian's web site, the story is archived at
http://www.tvlicensing.biz/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=701
OnDigital (the original digital terrestrial TV service in the UK) had the ability to stick a CAM (conditional access module) into the receiver boxes, to allow people to pay a subscription for premium content. This was a decryption device, meaning that only subscribers could watch the encrypted channels.
When the service became Freeview (run by the BBC), Greg d**e (then the Director General) took the decision to remove CAM support, because without it, digital BBC couldn't be funded by subscription. By deliberately scuppering this possibility, he hoped to ensure there would be no alternative to a mandatory TV licence.
| Quote: | | You dont know how lucky you are. |
No, you don't know how lucky you are:
http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0011/S00040.htm |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
| |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Igloo Theme Version 1.0 :: Created By: Andrew Charron
|